Fractional Flow Reserve Returns to Its Origins
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Fractional Flow Reserve
Traditionally, coronary artery disease was assessed using coronary angiographic guidance. Significant lesions were determined by the coronary angiographer. However, interobserver variability showed a significant limitation of interpretation of coronary angiography. Stent deployment and apposition were also evaluated based on angiographic appearance only. Risk factors for stent thrombosis and in...
متن کاملFractional flow reserve to guide coronary revascularization.
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become an increasingly important index for decision making with respect to revascularization of coronary artery stenosis. It is the gold standard to indicate whether a particular stenosis is responsible for inducible ischemia and it is generally accepted that a stenosis with an ischemic value of FFR is responsible for angina pectoris and a worse outcome, and sh...
متن کاملFractional Flow Reserve: From Homeland to Colony
IntRoductIon In current catheter research, there are 3 main directions with respect to fractional flow reserve (FFR), including instantaneous wave‐free ratio, noninvasive measurement of FFR, and FFR transferred from coronary circulation to other ischemia‐inducing circulation. Recently, an interesting study was published, in which FFR was performed to diagnose and guide stenting in chronic mesen...
متن کامل“Virtual” (Computed) Fractional Flow Reserve
Ma Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the “gold standard” for assessing the physiological significance of coronary artery disease during invasive coronary angiography. FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention improves patient outcomes and reduces stent insertion and cost; yet, due to several practical and operator related factors, it is used in <10% of percutaneous coronary intervention proc...
متن کاملFractional flow reserve-guided PCI.
n engl j med 372;1 nejm.org january 1, 2015 94 difference. The observed loss of FEV1 was neither a time-dependent nor a dose-dependent effect in the withdrawal group, as compared with the maintenance group. A difference of 38 ml between groups became apparent only after the final step of inhaled glucocorticoid withdrawal and did not change to a meaningful extent thereafter. Singanayagam et al. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1941-9651,1942-0080
DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.116.005435